THROWBACK REVIEW: Star Trek VI: The Undiscovered Country

And so here we stand.  The final film of the original six Star Trek films, and halfway through my Star Trek filmdom marathon reviews.Firstly let me just apologize for the delay in this review...but Boncos.  Yeah, I had a great time on Sunday watching my team get their third Championship, which didn't leave much room for writing my thoughts on this awesome film, but here I am, let's dive right into the Undiscovered Country.

Despite having seen this before, watching it however many years later, I cannot believe how strong this film is.  Like it just completely blew my mind that I'd forgotten how incredible this film is.  Has it replaced Voyage Home as my favorite Star Trek film of the original six.  Heck has it replaced First Contact as my personal favorite film of all Star Trek?  I don't know, but from start to finish, this film holds up.  It starts with a small dedication to the late Gene Roddenberry who passed before the film released, before setting the entire stage of the movie right then and there with an explosion on the Klingon Moon, Praxis, and one of my favorite ships, the Excelsior (with a much better looking bridge than last time), witnessing the Shockwave.  

Now not only is the opening scene with the Excelsior very impressive to watch, even if certain aspects appear slightly dated, but it's important to note the parallels that Star Trek is so very good at doing. I can't believe it took my father to point thus it, but this movie is basically a science fiction take off the end of the Cold War. He straight up said that Praxis was Chernobyl. He's right. The tie in of Chernobyl was very clever here, and just strengthens why I've come to love this movie so much.

And from there on out, the movie only strengthens in story as the Federation attempts to make peace with the long time enemies of Star Trek. We get an in depth look at Kirk's inner hatred of the Klingons being responsible for the death of his son, we get tension amongst all crew members who are unsure of peace is even possible, and we get an event that only broadens the impressive range of this movie. When a couple assassins successfully kill the ambassadors of the Klingon Empire, Kirk and McCoy are the prime suspects in the murder. From here, this movie starts to take on a feel similar to that of Law and Order, and it is glorious. 

From a trial scene, which ironically stars Michael Dorn (who plays a Klingon named....Worf), to a full blown investigation aboard the Enterprise, the entire length that Kirk is imprisoned in the Klingon mines, and the mystery is being solved by the crew of the Enterprise successfully keeps you in your seat, even at the edge of your seat at times. And the payoff is absolutely phenomenal. Watching it all these years later, I will admit, it pulled an ending I fully did not expect.  I won't dare spoil it, but I will reference it when I talk about a later film in the Trek franchise.

The action in this movie, much like Wrath of Kahn is perfectly paced, but I dare say, it's probably even better as far as tension.  Introducing a Klingon Bird of Prey that can fire while under cloak only builds the suspense, and seeing it just deliver such a beating to both the Enterprise, and the Excelsior is one of the coolest Star Trek scenes I can think of.  And the acting during this scene is just as great, from a frustrated Kirk calling for a torpedo that could save his ship, to the Klingon general endlessly quoting Shakespeare.  It's a sequence that is just excellently put together. I dare say that the only thing I wish could have been done slightly different...was having the Excelsior having just a little bit more to do with the scene.  I mean once it comes in, the Enterprise doesn't even hail it.  I think they could have been just a tad bit more involved with each other there, but that's just a minor gripe.

Heck, sitting here, I really cannot find any major faults with this film.  Unlike Wrath of Kahn, the story of Undiscovered Country keeps your interest from beginning to end. It doesn't phase out in the middle like Wrath of Kahn did for me. It genuinely kept my interest throughout the film.  And I will go ahead and challenge Wrath of Kahn yet again, and say...that Undiscovered Country's ending is nearly just as strong as that of Wrath of Kahn (not the thing I refused to spoil up above). I mean, sure Spock doesn't die or anything, but it's just...such a fitting end to the original crew, that I couldn't help but smile as the credits began to roll, and even shed just a few tears perhaps.  After everything's solved, the Enterprise receives a transmission from Starfleet to return for the official decommissioning of the Enterprise-A.  This also is something the crew is kinda saddened by because this was their final mission before most of them will retire. So what do they do?  They take the Enterprise out for one last run, to...wherever.  We get that famous monologue which gives the verbal change, "Where no man...where no one has gone before." And the signatures of all original cast members are shown on screen one at a time. Now THAT'S how you give the original crew a send off!

Star Trek VI: The Undiscovered Country has quickly become one of my favorite entries of the franchise.  I may be in some small denial but for all I know, it very well may have replaced First Contact as my personal favorite Star Trek film.  As far as Star Trek, and science fiction in general is concerned, there's not much else to say about just how well a great story is executed, which is why I am pleased to award The Undiscovered Country, with the fullest possible rating I can give, a full on four stars out of four.  It's well told, well acted, and played out to the fullest possible extent that it could do.  It's a film I will not dare ever forget as I did as a kid.  If you've not seen this film, or are new to the franchise or whatnot...just do yourself a favor and watch this.  It's a great way to have told how the Klingons and Federation finally put aside their differences, and it's just an all around fantastic film.  I guarantee you won't be disappointed.

Please feel free to suggest any films I should review down below.  Leave a comment on how you feel about the film, and as always, thanks for reading.

Final Verdict: 4/4

We are officially halfway through this marathon of Star Trek films. Six down, six more to go before July hits!  But if you'll permit me...I'm gonna take a small intermission and write a review I've been dying to write for some time now.  Feel free to check it out as well (its on my profile).

THROWBACK REVIEW: Star Trek V: The Final Frontier

There's a line in an episode of Futurama called "Where No Fan Has Gone Before" which sums up this film rather nicely. For those unfamiliar with the episode (and if you aren't, do yourself a favor and watch it), it takes place on a desert planet, and guest stars all surviving members at that time of the original Star Trek cast, minus James Doohan (who straight up said "No way."). It centers on an energy being named Melllvar, who is a diehard fan of the show, and forces the cast to perform an atrocious script he wrote. During a point, Leonard Nimoy, in his Spock attire approaches the being, and says "Melllvar, you have to respect your actors. When I directed Star Trek IV, I got a magnificent performance out of Bill because I respected him so much." To this, William Shatner immediately replies, "And when I directed Star Trek V, I got a magnificent performance out of me, because I respected me so much!"

Yeah, the name of this film alone is enough to make most Star Trek fans cringe in absolute disgust. To put it simply, this is a bad movie,  unless your name is James T. Kirk, Spock, or Leonard McCoy. How could such a film arise after a string of good films? Well the answer is in the first paragraph. William Shatner. I don't know the full story, but after finding success with directing in the previous two films, Shatner had enough, and wanted a piece of the action (pun intended), and thus he wrote and directed the infamous Final Frontier, the film many fans will call the bottom of the barrel in Star Trek filmdom. It was a film my parents refused to show me as a child, because it was so bad. Well I've finally seen it. So what do I think?

Honestly, I think it's rather sad....as in sad it's this bad, because the film had a LOT of potential. To those of you thinking this film just crashes and burns in every way possible, it doesn't. The film actually starts off fairly strong. I was actually kinda surprised. It's more when the film reaches the middle, and end where the biggest problems begin to take shape, but when this film hits the target, it can be very well done. And the first and foremost element that this film succeeds in is character development. The fleshing out of Kirk, Spock, and McCoy is at times, absolutely phenomenal. That's not a joke either, they share some genuinely deep, and very convincing moments together whether Kirk is saying how he knows he's going to die alone, or Spock is witnessing his birth, or McCoy is witnessing the death of his father, the development can be absolutely incredible...for these three characters.  Remember how I said this movie is good if you're named Kirk, Spock, or McCoy? It's because of the crew, they are the most heavily focused on.  The others barely get any screen time, development, or are just an overall joke on screen (particularly Scotty).

But aside from character development...this film's bad side heavily outweighs the good.  While decent at telling a story...for the most part, the film is absolutely littered with awkward scenes (ranging from dancing three-breasted cat-women, to Uhura dancing naked on a sand-dune), forgettable characters, poor editing, comedy that falls completely flat, and absolutely terrible special effects, the problems this film can have are endless.  This film had some potential in perhaps fleshing out diplomatic relations as the movie tries to focus on ambassadors from both the Federation, the Klingon Empire, and Romulan Star Empire.  But they're nearly forgotten about as the film goes on, shelved with the rest of the Star Trek cast.  The film's Klingon villain is absolutely laughable at how forgetable he is.  All he does is shoot space garbage, and chase the Enterprise.  And when he tries to battle, he gets a slap on the wrist by the Klingon ambassador, and is given the bad child treatment pretty much.  The film's villain...or anti-hero...I still don't know what to call him, in Spock's half-brother, Sybok is actually decently played out, but the fact that he's never been mentioned again or even hinted at is kinda disappointing.  There was a lot about him that genuinely kept my interest.  How was he able to do what he could?  Why did he have emotions despite being a Vulcan? But...he just...fizzled out. Erased from the franchise...

The story of the literal search for God I will go on a limb and say...is interesting, but poorly executed. But despite how poor the execution in this story can be...Shatner can be a riot to watch.  You can tell he is putting his heart and soul into everything this movie has to offer, and the result can be...laughably entertaining. Don't get me wrong, he does have some very deep moment with his friends, further developing his character as I said above, but at the end of the movie, you can tell where it's going.  Shatner's ego gets in the way and all of a sudden the story transforms from the search for God, to Kirk saves the day.  I don't know how high Shatner's egotistical high-horse was in this film but my God was it big.

When all is said and done, Star Trek V: The Final Frontier gets a one and a half star rating out of four. Yeah, it's bad.  Not at all a high point of the Star Trek franchise.  But as far as being the absolute worst of the worst? I wouldn't call it that.  Unlike Star Trek: The Motion Picture, this genuinely kept my interest, whether it was because of the little good there was in the film, or the laughably entertaining bad moments it had.  I find it easier to forgive this film than pictures like Insurrection or the Motion Picture.  For what it is...it's a bearable film for me. Not good.  Bad.  But I can watch it bad.  Thankfully, this would be the first and only film Shatner would direct, and I will say that's a good thing.  As much as Kirk is a fun character, Shatner's egotistical moods can get in the way of what could have been a very promising movie.  As it stands...The Final Frontier will forever be Shatner's final frontier. In more ways than one.

Please feel free to suggest future movies for me to review and to look at.  Leave a comment down below telling me your thoughts about this film, and as always, thanks for reading.

Final Verdict: 1.5/4

THROWBACK REVIEW: Star Trek IV: The Voyage Home

The beginning of The Voyage Home begins with a very touching dedication to the seven lives lost aboard the Challenger.  We've just hit the 30th anniversary of that disaster, and thirty years later, this film remains one of my personal favorite Star Trek films.  The Voyage Home goes into new waters for Star Trek as a franchise, blending a clever science fiction story in with some very funny comedy and the finished product that director Leonard Nimoy gives us is more than satisfactory.  While some elements may not be as strong as others, the good far outweighs the bad in this film, and it gives a satisfactory ending to the dubbed "trilogy" of Star Trek films that began with Wrath of Kahn.

And I gotta say for as much praise as I will give this film, it's very ironic that this is one of the only Star Trek films that barely features the Enterprise.  Most of the story focuses on the crew aboard their captured Klingon Bird of Prey, which they name the HMS Bounty.  With the Enterprise being destroyed last film, we don't get a shot of the newly constructed Enterprise-A, until the very final shot of the film.  Yet this film is still awesome.  When you make a Star Trek film, and barely show the Enterprise at all, yet still come out on top, you know you've done good. So huge props to Nimoy there.  He certainly knew how to write this story, and make it entertaining.

Now that's not to say that the film is without problems.  I've heard many people complain about the environmental message which only seems forced.  And yeah...it does seem forced.  Nothing against the whales, being a lover of the ocean myself, there are many animals that I am concerned about when it comes to their status as endangered...but Humpbacks are not endangered.  The film ventures into fiction at that area, which is kinda weird.  Why not direct the attention towards a species that really is endangered?  Such as certain species of Orca, or as they mention in the film, the Blue Whale, which actually IS endangered? I guess a Blue Whale wouldn't fit on the Bird of Prey.  I'm just kinda nitpicking here, because the movie is so entertaining that it's easy to give a pass on the environmental message. It is cleverly done, even if a little forced.

I've also heard some people say they don't care for the comedy, and that's a point I just brush aside.  Star Trek may not be known as a comedy, but when they write good comedy, it shouldn't just be brushed aside.  And a story about a crew from the 23rd century, trapped in the late 20th century is just RIPE for comedy.  And the writers took advantage of it, because the results could be nothing short of phenomenal. From Kirk shouting at a Taxi driver who nearly ran him over "Double dumb-ass on you!" to Spock nerve pinching a punk rock fan unconscious on the bus, to Scotty talking to an old Apple computer, "Hello, computer1", to Dr. McCoy getting disgusted by 20th century medicine, which is honestly one of the funniest scenes in the movie.  It is absolutely hilarious when Kirk's crew is walking around in their red Starfleet uniforms in the heart of San Fransisco, past people wearing aviators, and other 80's apparel.  They stick out like a sore thumb, and the crew barely cares about it.  What is there not to love? You can try and bring up an argument with me on how that doesn't feel like Star Trek, but you know what? Comedy happens to everyone. If you're from the 23rd Century, and don't have a clue how life works in a time two hundred years before you, you're going to run into comedy.

For a while, this was one of my favorite Star Trek films, and it still is.  Watching it again, I can't really find much wrong with it aside from small little nit pickings. Why is Time Warp so simple?  Why was their return trip not as rough as their entry trip? Other smaller questions like that.  But for what it is, it's a strong film, and probably one of the better Nimoy films.  And it's a shame that his success with Star Trek III and Star Trek IV would become a little controversial to fellow actor William Shatner, who wanted a piece of the pie...but that's a whole different movie all together, and one we'll get to next time.

Star Trek IV: The Voyage Home earns a three and a half out of four stars with me.  It's storytelling is incredible, and it provides a most satisfying conclusion to the trilogy that started with Wrath of Kahn two movies ago.  The characters are the same lovable characters you've come to know and love, and the comedy is easily some of the best that Star Trek has ever done.  Honestly, I don't think there's a funnier Trek movie or episode out there, and I'm glad for it.  Whether you watch it in I sequence with the other movies, or as a standalone film, it is going to be enjoyable all around for the lovers of Star Trek and science fiction. If you think I'm kidding...well to quote Spock, "The hell I ain't."

Please feel free to suggest a film for me to review in the future.  Leave a comment down below on how you feel about this film, and as always, thanks for reading.

Final Verdict: 3.5/4

THROWBACK REVIEW: Star Trek III: The Search for Spock

They say there's a bit of a myth/curse when it comes to Star Trek movies. You've likely heard it by now, it's that the odd numbered movies are bad, and that the even numbered movies are good. And in some cases, it's strangely accurate, but in some cases, I think it's a silly idea. And this movie is exhibit A when it comes to that, because frankly, I think this movie is just as strong as its predecessor. Now granted, those are some big words for a movie coming off the heels of Wrath of Kahn, but in many instances, there are moments in this movie that impressed me in ways that Wrath of Kahn didn't as much. Now that's not to say it's better, because there are a few things in this film I do rub my head at, but to call it a bad film is highly inaccurate.

The Search for Spock takes place immediately following the events of Wrath of Kahn, and that's a trend that no other Trek film (except for the film following this one) does.  This is the second film of a designated "trilogy", and it takes on the torch as we see a battle-beaten USS Enterprise, limping towards Starfleet, scheduled to be decommissioned. We also get an introduction to one of my personal favorite ships of Starfleet, the ship dubbed the "Great Experiment", USS Excelsior, which to date remains one of my favorite ideas and designs for any Star Trek ship. The Excelsior's color, smooth design, and even sounds at first are just beautiful to witness, though I will say that in this movie, the bridge is a little ugly. But thankfully, that's fixed in Star Trek VI (but we'll get to that soon enough). It also gets a bit of a laugh in the film when Montgomery Scott sabotages it's awesome transwarp technology, and it sputters out literally in space...and it sounds like a cartoon car dying.  Oh the indignity... And the inner nerd still rages about how Starfleet immediately ditched Transwarp after this movie, but that's a rant for another day.

We get a little flashback to Star Trek II, specifically when Spock decides to sacrifice himself to fix the Warp Core of the Enterprise, and we see that he's put his essence into the mind of Dr. McCoy. And this might be the biggest thing I scratch my head at.  The idea of putting an essence into someone?  I've seen this done in so many ways now, that I really don't know if there is a good way of doing it or not.  I didn't like it in Chappie when it literally erased any death of the main characters, I didn't care for it in Transcendence when it actually led me on an interesting trip of wondering if the main character in the computer was indeed the main character, or a rogue machine, only to pull one of the stupidest endings I've ever seen at me, and here, where machines aren't even a part of the equation, I'm still unsure about it.  Now it's not NEARLY a plot device as the other two films I just mentioned, and the idea of Spock's soul trapped in the mind of Dr. McCoy is actually very intriguing.  But I would have liked it more if it actually hindered McCoy more.  Instead, they give him some drugs and it's pretty much rendered quiet for the rest of the film.  I would have liked this idea explored more.  How was Spock able to put his essence into McCoy by a simple mind-meld?  We're there any other symptoms that McCoy perhaps had to deal with from such a burden?  Just simple questions like this to give us a better idea of how the overall idea works.  But it's just kinda glossed over for much of the film.  That is the film's biggest fault in my book.  While Spock's return to the franchise is a welcome one to me, as he is my favorite character in Trek, it just seemed a little too convienient to bring him back in the way presented.  

But enough about that, let's talk about the good.  The villain.  Christopher Lloyd, before he was known as Dr. Emmett Brown, plays a Klingon Commander named Kruge, and he is just so much fun on screen.  Now granted, he's not as strong a villain as Kahn, but in my opinion, he doesn't need to be. He's one of my favorite villains of the franchise. He effectively left the Enterprise dead in the water, he has his minions kill Kirk's son in an actually very emotional scene (and again, Shatner pulls a decent emotional breakdown when that happens, which kinda makes up for his dry response of the fact he even had a son to begin with in the previous film), and he's just...such a fun Klingon.  Whether his persistent headstrong personality is getting in the way of finding out the secret of the Genesis planet, or having a fun fistfight with Kirk, Christopher Lloyd had a lot of fun in this role, and you can tell by his performance. He is a born Klingon.  

And speaking of the Enterprise...it has the strongest scene in the movie.  I remember the first episode I saw in which Kirk activated the auto-destruct sequence of the Enterprise.  "Let That Be Your Last Battlefield" was a very strong episode, and for it to come in the absolutely ATROCIOUS season 3 of Star Trek (and no, this episode does not redeem that season), I will say surprised me.  And it introduced the concept of the auto-destruct sequence.  The thing is, much like the first motion picture, the auto destruct was paced...very slow.  So the tension really wasn't there for me.  Here, they capture that needed tension in the short time needed, and I gotta say that though it's a very strong scene, it does get a bit of a laugh when the Klingons board and have no idea what's going on despite an audio countdown. But seeing the Enterprise, the ship we grew to love, a ship that is by all means the poster ship of science fiction, a ship that is in many ways untouchable in the levels of cool in Starship's in general, going up in flames, seeing that registry number disintegrating in flame on screen really hits home.  You fans out there may know that the Constitution Class Enterprise isn't exactly a ship I worship, but any incarnation of the Enterprise is cool in my book. And seeing it erupt into flames like that when it was set to be decommissioned was just...strangely touching.   

There are a few other scenes I kinda question, from Spock aging rapidly from infancy to a possible theory my father brought up of the possibility of Saavik getting pregnant after sating Spock's Pon Farr, but overall there's not enough bad about this film to negate any enjoyability in watching it.  Sure it does some things better than other things but overall, it's a good follow up.  Again, I just don't think many people look at it as strongly, mainly because it may have needed a villain as strong as Kahn or a more emotional ending, which this one didn't really have.  But for what it was, I don't let anyone talk bad about it, because it needs to be said that...well in Star Trek fashion, the points of the good...outweigh the points of the bad....or something.  I tried.

Star Trek III: The Search for Spock earns three stars out of four from me.  A great follow up to Kahn, and just an overall great movie.  As the first movie to be directed from Spock in the franchise, it really was a fun movie.  Yeah there are a few things that are silly or just don't fit, but again, those small things don't do anything to the good of this film.  But you don't have to take my word for it.  Give it a watch after watching Wrath of Kahn.  You won't be disappointed.

Please feel free to share your opinions on the film down below. Leave a comment for any film you'd wish me to review.  See you next time as my Voyage through Trek filmdom continues in Star Trek IV, and as always, thanks for reading.

Final Verdict: 3/4

THROWBACK REVIEW: Star Trek II: The Wrath of Kahn

My journey through Trek filmdom goes on.  From what you may remember, the Motion Picture was not one I was easy on.  I had a lot of interesting feedback on my harshness towards it, so before I talk about the film's successor, let me just say this.  Back in the day, it may have wowed audiences, but there are many films that have wowed audiences from back in the day, that have aged very well and still stand out.  Star Trek: The Motion Picture is not one of those pictures.  As I said, it has some interesting concepts, but horrid pacing, and slow storytelling hurt the film...and with film such as the one I'm about to talk about now in the Star Trek filmography...it is one I will likely never care for.  Now that that's out of the way, let's go from bad to good, because the first film's successor is a vast improvement, and I don't think that needs to be said.

I'm honestly not sure where to begin with this review because I have a bad feeling that many hardcore Trek fans will not like where I stand on this film.  Now don't get the wrong idea.  This is NOT a bad film.  At all. It's entertaining, it's got good pacing, and it tells a fluent story that in many cases is very well told.  But this is. The film that many fans will call the quintessential best of the best in Star Trek filmography.  It's got quite a legacy, and it's got a lot of love from the fandom.  But...honestly....I don't think it's the best Star Trek film (put your guns away).  

The idea to reintroduce what is now Star Trek's most memorable villain I must say must have been a very fun idea.  Reading on the legacy this film had I found out that at one point, it was thought that this would be the final Star Trek film out there.  Maybe the last thing Star Trek related even.  So the idea of bringing Kahn into the picture, a villain who was only seen in one episode is a move I'm not sure I'll ever understand, but hey it does payoff.  Ricardo Montalbán returns to reprise the iconic role, and you can tell he is enjoying every last moment of it.  It's a great performance.  Kahn is introduced flawlessly to the audience...but being the fan I am...and a critic at the same time...I must point out the obvious plot hole that immediately popped up in this film.  Chekov should not have known who Kahn was, nor would Kahn know who Chekov was, as Chekov wasn't even on the show when Kahn had his episode.  I brought this up before and got all sorts of fan theories about how Chekov was likely on the Enterprise and bumped into him and whatnot, and you can bring up any theory you want.  The writers screwed up.  Accept it.

I'm gonna backtrack and bring up Kahn's introduction again, because it is easily one of my favorite parts of the film.  When we last saw Kahn, he was being given a second chance by Kirk to survive on a lush world after Kahn failed to take over the Enterprise.  We now see Kahn on a desert wasteland, ravaged after a nearby planet in the system unfortunetaly was destroyed, just giving off such a sinister vibe.  I'm gonna go as far as to say that his introduction rivals that of the first time we saw Darth Vader on screen.  Kahn gives off this deep and buried grudge of hatred for what happened over the past fifteen years, and we get just some of the most tormenting scenes we can think of when he puts these creatures in the ears of Chekov and his captain...it's a scene that still makes me cringe.  It was a perfect way of reintroducing Kahn to the audience.  But unfortunetaly, I kinda feel that Kahn's strength as the villain only goes downhill after that.

There's a lot of story in the middle of this movie that I feel just could have been executed better.  Personally, I never got enough reason to believe that Kahn would go on a bloodthirsty manhunt for Kirk in this movie.  That's not to say that it doesn't give us some really tense showdowns.  The first showdown of the Reliant and the Enterprise is perfectly paced and just as tense as it was thirty years ago. And the SECOND showdown between the Reliant and Enterprise?  The Nebula battle is just incredible shot.  I loved seeing the Reliant passing underneath the larger Enterprise in the nebula.  It's arguably one of the most memorable shots of the entire film.  But there are just some things such as Kahn's death, and the reveal of Kirk's son that I feel are just not pulled off as well as they could have been.  Heck, the creation of a planet from the Genesis device, which this plot centers itself on is kinda just glanced over.  For what it is...honestly, I feel that a lot of the story in the middle of this film just...is missing something. 

So let's talk about why this film is remembered so much.  And personally, I feel that this might be why so many fans will call it the best Star Trek film.  The ending of this film is arguably one of the strongest, if not the strongest ending I've seen in Star Trek, in which we get the iconic death of Spock, and his funeral.  And I gotta say watching it all these years later, I won't lie, I almost got a little emotional myself (and not just because last year we said goodbye to Mr. Nimoy).  Just thinking of Spock's decision to sacrifice himself to save the ship is pretty dang strong, but it's the funeral that really hits it, and as much fun as it is to poke fun at Shatner for his performances, he actually pulled the emotions his character is supposed to be feeling off incredibly well.  Hearing his voice beginning to break at the phrase "...his was the most human.", can be heartbreaking to hear for all the right reasons.  While we will always poke fun at Shatner screaming "KAAAHHHN!", it should be said that his performance is one of his strongest in the Trek franchise.

So there are certainly reasons I can see why so many would worship this film as being the best of the best in Star Trek...but for me personally, I've seen stronger films which we'll get to.  Despite some absolutely gorgeous shots, excellently paced action, and such an emotional ending, the middle of this movie I feel can be very non-existent.  While it kept my interest, I didn't feel the story could have been told well enough in certain areas it needed to be.  The reveal of certain facts seemed to be glossed over a little too simply, particularly that of the reveal of Kirk having a son.  Kirk's response to me seemed a little dry.  And I feel that the overall concepts of the Genesis device could have been executed better.  But for what we got, it really is an entertaining ride, and is rightfully called one of the stronger films for many reasons.  All of them holding water.

The Wrath of Kahn is a three and a half out of four stars for me.  With strong and memorable performances from both Ricardo and William in this film, alongside some of the most iconic moments of this franchise, it is a must see for any Star Trek fan.  While I may not worship the ground it walks on, it did start off a trend of strong films for the franchise.  Films we will eventually get to.  And yeah, while I will nitpick on certain things in this film, the fans shouldn't get the idea that I don't like this film.  I will say that there are a few things I laughed at, such as some obvious stock footage from the first film (being a fan of Godilla films, this is a thing I really don't care for too much).  But small criticisms aside, it's a strong film, and nothing's gonna change that.

Please feel free to share your opinions on the film down below.  Leave a comment for any film you'd wish for me to review.  See you next time on my journey through Star Trek's films, and as always, thanks for reading.

Final Verdict: 3.5/4

THROWBACK REVIEW: Star Trek: The Motion Picture

Fifty years ago, Gene Roddenberry gave us a franchise that would revolutionize science fiction, and in many cases, the world as we know it.  You can say what you want about Star Trek as a franchise, and whether or not it's good, but it has changed life in more ways than one.  From inspiring so many people to go into programs like NASA, to revolutionizing our technology that so many of us use daily.  It is a quintessential franchise of science fiction if you ask me, and a personal favorite.  And to celebrate fifty years, I am watching, and reviewing each and every film made to date before the newest film comes out this year.  And we start this marathon out with...the Motion Picture.

And let me tell you that despite my love for the franchise...despite being a tolerant, patient, and open-minded fan of the series...never has Star Trek bored the hell out of me quite like this...except for maybe Season 3 of the original series.  Doug Walker said when reviewing this film, that the film feels less like Star Trek, and more like it is trying to be 2001: A Space Odyssey, and that's a statement I am inclined to believe.  Not only are there so many similar concepts and scenes (despite the fact that it's been a VERY VERY long time since I watched that film), but it's dragged out and just as slow.  I can't do too much comparing here because again...I can barely remember 2001. But in the case of this film...it just didn't work.

How Star Trek could have started it's film career off like this, let alone stayed alive past this film is quite frankly, beyond me. The acting isn't anything spectacular, a lot of the effects seem dated, and despite some interesting concepts of a world of artificial beings, coming across an ancient Earth spacecraft, and giving it a mind of it's own to relay the programming to it's "creator", it just doesn't hold my interest.  The only reason I remember one character, Decker, is because apparently he's the son of who I believe is my favorite one-time character of the original series, Commodore Matt Decker, who appeared in "The Doomsday Machine" in season 2, which is a personal favorite of mine.  Other than that, I don't remember anyone else's name beyond the original crew.  And on a random note, McCoy has one of the worst lines I've heard in the franchise in this film. "Why is any object that we don't understand always called a 'thing'?"  I kinda rubbed my head at that line.

I love the ships of Star Trek.  I love the Excelsior, Voyager, I love Romulan Warbirds, I love Klingon Battlecruisers, and Birds of Prey, I love the many many many designs of Starfleet's many many vessels, and of course...I love the Enterprise.  That being said...was it necessary to devote nearly five minutes of screen time to revealing it?  This is the film's biggest problem.  Pacing.  Putting the movie in, I was treated to nearly three minutes of stars going by as a soft melody played.  Then the Paramount logo appeared.  That goes to show you just how much trouble I was in.  There are so many dragged out scenes, in this film, that I literally feel like I could cut a majority of this film...and have maybe a somewhat decent Star Trek episode for you.  I barely remember any major lines of this film, maybe aside from Spock's "weeping for V'ger" line.  I barely remember any interesting conflict.  All I remember are shots that just wouldn't end.  Ask anyone I know and they will say I'm a very patient guy.  Never before has a film tested my patience like this. I'm actually quite impressed.

There are so many scenes and sequences in this film that just don't make any sense to me.  How was the Enterprise able to warp and create a wormhole?  Why was this "next step in our evolution" never ever mentioned again in the entire franchise?  Why was....God I can't even remember that many of the questions this movie gave me.  Here's one.  Why was this movie even made?  Sitting here writing this...I'm trying to be forgiving of something I'm not ven sure I should forgive.  I'm asking myself if this movie has made it onto my own personal list of my topmost hated movies of all time. Has it?  I don't know.  I've seen worse...but I will say that some of the worst movies that have said to have been made, gave me more entertainment factors than this did. Whether they were so bad they were laughably good, or whatnot...this movie just gave me so little...and coming from Star Trek?  That's a near unforgivable sin. There is always SOMETHING to take away in a Star Trek episode most of the time.  ALWAYS SOMETHING to capture your imagination or interest.  And this...I can't think of anything.  The concepts that I found interesting just...seemed like they didn't fit.  And that personally...is what I hate about this movie.

Star Trek: The Motion picture...is a measely half star rating out of four. Of what I remember from all the Star Trek movies, it is the least memorable, least enticing, and least enjoyable film I have seen in my journey. And depending on how I view the rest of the Trek films to come...it may have just become my least favorite Trek film to date, replacing a film we will get to. All I could do, was check the disc running time as this played,and ask why it was still going.  But...there is something of irony in this film.  My father did make a big point...as bad as the film is...it was the stepping stone for everything I've grown to love about Star Trek as I know it.  Without it, there would be no Next Generation.  There would be no other Trek movies.  There would be no Deep Space 9, no Voyager.  How Star Trek managed to cling to the life it had after this film...let alone vastly improve upon it, may be one of those many unsolved mysteries of life for me for as long as I live.  But I will say that...I am thankful it led the way to the superior Trek I know and love...but that doesn't excuse it.  It's a forgettable ride that doesn't offer much of anything for a Trek fan...it has easily gained it's nickname as the "Slowmotion Picture" for a reason, and watching it here, that legacy remains unchanged.

Please feel free to share your thoughts on the film below. Leave a request for which film you'd like to see reviewed, and as always, thanks for reading.

Final Verdict: .5/4

REVIEW: Star Wars: The Force Awakens (SPOILER FREE)

I'm not sure how to begin this review.  Because as I sit here, I'm still kinda just reflecting on how special this Star Wars movie is to me.  I was told by my family that this was a movie my father personally wanted to see.  I'm not sure why.  I am older than he was when the first movies came out, and when the prequels came out, let's just say that I was too young to get anything that was going on.  And now that I've seen Star Wars 7, I'm wondering if in spirit, this movie reflects what it was like all those years ago to see the words "Star Wars" grace the screen for the very first time.

Fans will be pleased to know that J.J. Abrams has given this franchise the new blood it has so desperately been needing for years now.  Fans will be treated to the nostalgia of the original trilogy (maybe a little too much if you ask me), the light-hearted humor that was welcoming in all the movies, and the glory of old familiar faces, while introducing us to new faces with characters that are just as interesting and entertaining.  Yes.  It needs to be said that Star Wars 7 is easily amongst the best of the franchise.  From the time you start reading the opening scroll, to when that all too familiar fanfare is playing during the credits.  It steers away from the complexity that made the Prequels so weak, and goes back to just giving us that old fashioned space-fantasy adventure that we all loved to begin with, and...that's about all I can say.

Now no, that's not my review, it just needs to be said that...there really isn't a lot done in this film that hasn't been done before.  I don't wanna call it a carbon-copy of the very first Star Wars movie (the 1977 movie, not Phantom Menace), but in many ways it very much feels like that, and I'm not sure if that's something I like or not.  It literally feels like there was a checklist of scenes that were fun and iconic from the very first Star Wars film, the slightly redone to fit this film.  From beginning to end. And I know a LOT of fans might roast me for pointing that out, but...I didn't come to see a redo of the first film.  I have a feeling that a lot of fans who go, hoping to see something new, might be disappointed.  BUT don't let that stop you, because the movie is by no means bad.  

In fact, that little jab at the movie up above might be my only problem with the movie on a whole.  And despite it feeling so...so very familiar, it does do things new, and it can be incredible to witness.  I absolutely loved Fin.  His attitude was laughable, enjoyable, and when he held that light saber, man he just channeled a badass for me.  In fact he has my favorite line of the movie, and my favorite background as far as new characters go.  But as I said, I'm keeping this spoiler free.  

The galaxy is as detailed as ever.  But if that wasn't enough, the combat has been taken to new heights.  It's not as clunky as it was in the late 70's and 80's.  It's energetic and tense.  And I'm gonna say, the light saber duel might just be my new favorite.  That Sith lightsaber that so many people have rebuked for its broadsword design?  It's actually pretty well done, and I must applaud them for taking risks in trying something new for that.  And speaking of risks, there are plenty done in the movie.  There will be some scenes that will leave you with your mouth open.  You might find yourself asking "did that really just happen?"  How the community reacts to those circumstances, I guess I'll find out in due time.

All in all, the film has succeeded in what we were hoping for.  J.J. Abrams was the perfect choice to direct this.  With his previous work in Star Trek (which I still like, even if it's different), he did have the practice under his belt.  He's reached into the heart of the franchise, and birthed something that the fans will love, no matter what age, and that was what made Star Wars great to begin with.  It starts well, keeps that energy, and leave you on a high, which only leaves you wishing the film were maybe 15 minutes longer.  But as for what awaits us in Star Wars 8...time will tell.

Star Wars: The Force Awakens, is issued with tough love, with small criticisms, a three and a half out of four stars.  If you're a Star Wars fan, you will want to see this movie.  With the legacy of this franchise, you'll have the time.  I fully expect this movie to not only break records, but give us a firm base for what to expect in the future.  THe bar has been raised for future Star Wars films.  Disney now has a challenge.  With a new Star Wars film to come out annually...I still have my doubts that they'll be able to keep up the pace.  But who knows?  Again, time will tell.

Feel free to share your opinion on the film down below.  And as always, thanks for reading.

Final Verdict: 3.5/4